The production of softwood sawn timber grew by 9.2% in the third quarter and amounted to 2.6 million cubic metres. Pulp production also increased substantially and was up 11.1% compared to the corresponding period last year. Forest industry corporations produced a total of 1.9 million tonnes of pulp in July–September.
Paperboard production grew by as much as 17.5% in the third quarter, to 840,000 tonnes, boosted particularly by new investments in the forest industry. At the same time, paper production declined by 5% and amounted to 1.7 million tonnes.
Paper production has fallen by 6.1% since the start of the year. Forest industry corporations’ production was 5.1 million tonnes in January–September, but production growth continued in other product categories.
Since the start of the year, forest industry corporations produced 6.5% more softwood sawn timber than in the corresponding period in 2015, for a total production volume of 8.4 million cubic metres. Pulp production increased at almost the same rate, with a year-on-year increase of 6.4% in January–September and a total production volume of 5.6 million tonnes. Paperboard production grew by 10% to 2.5 million tonnes during the first three quarters of the year.
Reasonable energy costs prevent carbon leakage
“The Government Programme states that industrial costs will not be increased. This is an important policy that must be maintained. Reasonable energy costs, as well as reasonable costs related to raw material use and logistics, are essential for the Finnish forest industry,” says Timo Jaatinen, Director General of the Finnish Forest Industries Federation.
Fair treatment compared to the countries that compete with the Finnish forest industry helps prevent carbon leakage, which refers to the relocation of production operations. It also makes it possible to maintain the targets set for renewable energy. The forest industry produces two thirds of Finland’s renewable energy.
In September, the government submitted a proposal to the parliament on implementing compensation for the costs of emissions trading at a rate of 50% of the maximum allowed by the EU, which would reduce the competitive disadvantage of Finnish industry. Germany, for example, has implemented compensation for the costs of emissions trading at the full rate allowed by the EU. It is important to ensure that the model drafted by the government will not be changed.
“Consistent decisions and policies are essential from the perspective of businesses. The changes proposed in the public discussion on the issue would be contrary to this principle,” Jaatinen explains.
For further information, please contact: Director General Timo Jaatinen, Finnish Forest Industries Federation, tel. +3589 132 6600